Jeremy Jacquet Rejects Arsenal Move to Stay at Rennes

SportsCafe Desk

Rennes defender Jeremy Jacquet has rejected a transfer to Arsenal, opting to stay and develop at his current club. The 21-year-old, under contract until 2029, impressed last season after returning from a loan spell.

Rennes defender Jeremy Jacquet has rejected a transfer to Arsenal, opting to stay and develop at his current club. The 21-year-old, under contract until 2029, impressed last season after returning from a loan spell. Arsenal had targeted Jacquet amid uncertainty over Jakub Kiwior’s future, but the Frenchman remains committed to Rennes’ long-term project.

For the latest in Arsenal’s summer transfer activity, the Gunners have faced a setback as Rennes defender Jeremy Jacquet has rejected a move to North London. Despite Arsenal’s efforts to reinforce their backline amid concerns over Jakub Kiwior’s future, Jacquet has opted to stay with Rennes to continue his development. The 21-year-old France U21 international recently signed a contract extension that runs until June 2029 and has stated he is "very happy" to grow with the club.

Arsenal have already spent around £200 million this summer on six signings, including centre-back Cristhian Mosquera from Valencia for £13 million. Still, sporting director Andrea Berta remains eager to bring in more players, particularly Crystal Palace’s Eberechi Eze and a second central defender.

Jacquet, who spent part of last season on loan at Clermont, returned to Rennes and made 11 Ligue 1 appearances, showcasing his versatility by playing in both three- and four-man defences, as well as covering at full-back. Rennes are firmly against letting him leave and consider him a key part of their future plans. Their sporting director, Loic Desire, praised Jacquet’s physical strength, confidence, and deep roots in the club’s academy structure as key reasons for keeping him.

laught0
astonishment0
sadness0
heart0
like0
dislike0

Comments

0/1000

Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions

0 Comments